| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:19 |
|
I have a birth cert for William Ector, born 29 April 1874, Wolstanton, Staffs - mothers name is given as Sarah Ector, but fathers name has a line through it.
However, on his marriage cert in 1899 William's father's name is given as Thomas Ector, profession Glostplacer (it's someone who puts glazed (glost) pottery into a kiln).
Assuming roughly 20 years between generations, I'm thinking Thomas had to be born roughly 1850 - 1854, and Sarah probably around the same dates.
I can't for the life of me find a marriage for a Thomas Ector to a Sarah, or any trace of Thomas on any censuses. Lots of Sarah Ectors - but none seem to fit.
Could anyone please help me out of my misery?!
Thanks in advance
Lynne
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:24 |
|
Possible???
1881 England Census about William Ector Name: William Ector Age: 6 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1875 Relation: Son Mother's Name: Sarah Gender: Male Where born: Tunstall, Staffordshire, England Civil Parish: Wolstanton County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Street address: 5 Smith St Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Scholar Registration district: Wolstanton Sub registration district: Tunstall ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Sarah Ector 36 Thomas Ector 13 William Ector 6 Ernest Ector Thomas Bailey 37 (Potters Ovenman)
Dee xx
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:26 |
|
Hi Dee
Yes, I've got that one, but it's William's dad I can't find - and I'm starting to wonder if Thomas Bailey is the culprit...
;)
Lynne
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:28 |
|
And again;
1891 England Census about William Ector Name: William Ector Age: 17 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1874 Relation: Son Mother's Name: Sarah Ann Gender: Male Where born: Burslem, Staffordshire, England Civil Parish: Wolstanton Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary Town: Tunstall County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View Image Registration district: Wolstanton Sub registration district: Tunstall ED, institution, or vessel: 15 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Sarah Ann Ector 47 Thomas Ector 23 John Ector 21 William Ector 17 Ernest Ector 11 Sarah J Ector 7 Sarah Ector 10 Neice Mary L Ector 17 Neice Thomas Bailey 47 <<<<
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:29 |
|
Hi Lynne,
I would say Thomas Bailey IS the father.
Dee xx
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:33 |
|
Yep, I'm inclined to agree - just wanted someone else to help me confirm!!
Now all have to do is find Sarah's birth and death and add in Bailey to my surnames list... sigh....
Well, it stops me watching the telly!
Thanks for your help
Lynne
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:33 |
|
This looks odd;
1871 England Census about Sarah Ector Name: Sarah Ector Age: 24 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1847 Relation: Boarder Gender: Female Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Tunstall Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch Town: Tunstall County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Street address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Disability: View Image Registration district: Wolstanton Sub registration district: Tunstall ED, institution, or vessel: 14 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 148 Household Members: Name Age Mary Ann Bailey 38 John Bailey 13 Thomas Bailey 10 James Bailey 5 Sarah Ector 24 Thomas Ector 4 James Ector 3 Mary Ector 23 Dee xx
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 20:39 |
|
Menage a trois??????
OK. I can see some serious spade work happening now - and a visit to Staffordshire.
Thanks again, Denise
Lynne
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
26 Mar 2009 21:31 |
|
Ah, Ectors - got your PM about my help in another thread (you'd just discovered "My Threads"!) and had no memory ...
Not this one:
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1132276
(more recent Ectors)
Still don't know what I done! Oh, here it is, different board:
http://www.genesreunited.co.uk/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1132275
... and I now see Victoria and I did exactly the same work on the two different boards. For future ref: don't do that again!!
Looking at Dee's 1871 household:
Mary Ann Bailey 38 - widow, charwoman, born Stoke, Staffordshire John Bailey 13 - son, born Edinburgh, Scotland Thomas Bailey 10 - son, Newcastle in Emlyn, Scotland James Bailey 5 - son, born Tunstall, Staffordshire, England Sarah Ector 24 - unmarried, boarder, potter transferrer Thomas Ector 4 - boarder's son James Ector 3 - boarder's son Mary Ector 23 - boarder, potter's assistant
Sorting that all out is going to take some work. I don't see the Baileys in Scotland in 1861.
Thomas Bailey in 1881:
Name: Thomas Bailey Age: 37 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: Tunstall, Staffordshire, England Occupation: Potters Ovenman
If he was Mary's husband, she wasn't a widow in 1871.
Where was he in 1871? The closest one I seee was in Wolstanton, dob 1847, and was a waiter.
I suspect the relationship between Sarah Ector and Mary Bailey in 1871 was some sort of in-law -- she was a sister-in-law of Thomas Bailey, for instance.
And I agree that Thomas Bailey looks like William's father. It was not at all uncommon for a child of an unmarried woman to make up a name out of real father's given name + own/mother's surname, for marriage purposes.
Anybody found Sarah Ector in 1851 or 1861?? Or a birth?
Births Mar 1847 Hector Sarah Salford 20 976
?
Yup.
Name: Sarah Hector Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1847 Relation: Lodger Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil Parish: Burslem Town: Burslem County/Island: Staffordshire
William Hyland 36 Bridget Hyland 34 Bridget Hyland 9 Julia Hyland 7 Mary Hyland 5 David Hyland 4 Matthew Hyland 4 Mo John Hector 34 - lodger Mary Hector 30 Sarah Hector 4 Marin Hector 13
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
27 Mar 2009 09:21 |
|
Evie Beavie
You are a wonder and a star!!! I've got the hang of the boards, messages and threads now - I was a total greenhorn when I did the first lot - oops, apologies....
Thanks to your digging and the Hectors, I can now go back along that route for my gran's family. I'd about given up hope!! Hubby and I are off to Staffordshire in the May half term to visit the Records Office and have a look at some of the places in the tree.
And can I just say that thanks to your digging on my other side, I've managed to make contact with a lady who turns out to be my grandma's niece - dad's cousin, who I knew nothing about.
Well, I have enough info now to set me off on yet another track, so thanks all, and I'm glad I took next week off work...
Lynne
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
27 Mar 2009 09:32 |
|
Ah shucks.
I was gonna go for "Hector" all along -- having seen Hesters be Esther and vice versa, and an Ealey be a Healey recently, and some Eaton/Heatons a while back. And my grx2 grandmother the Hoare, who turned out to be pronounced 'Oar, when I dug around to find out about the name. And I'd had such fun telling my mother I'd discovered her great-mother was a Hoare!
Remind me. What was this other line of yours?
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
27 Mar 2009 13:21 |
|
Sorry Evie, I meant digging BY my side, not on the other side - kinda got a bit excited and let my fingers run away with me!!
Anyway Thanks again for all the hard work, I'm now going to spend the rest of the afternoon (having been to work and back) sifting through all the info I now have.
And thanks to another kind person who has a match on my tree, I now have a line through a great great grandmother going back to about 1570.... that's a lot to take in. I'm going to dig around in that one for a while and see if I can do some proving!
Everyone has been so helpful, and I'm now trying to help a few others when and where I can to give a bit of payback! This is a great community, and I have to say that I am now totally addicted - not only in my own tree, but in others as well - I find myself watching threads and following up leads left right and centre.
I'll let you know when I've sorted all through it and uploaded everything, and let you have a peek at my tree!
Lynne
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
27 Mar 2009 17:55 |
|
Aargh! No PMs, no trees!
I'm an introvert. I get overload. I get twitchy.
Tip for starting out on the other side. Of the boards, that is. ;)
Hang about late at night. It's mainly Aussies then, but a large portion of their questions are really English - they're trying to make the leap back to mother England in their trees. So you're the expert then. And with nobody much around, you can often do a bit of poking about at your leisure.
I've suggested that newbies do this and even try calling dibs on a question to get a bit of time to take a shot at it. If you said something like "I'm going to have a look in the 1841 census for you" and then went off to do it, I for one would be more than happy to stand back and watch. In fact I'd add a post saying just that and hope any of the other old pros in the vicinity would hold off too.
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
27 Mar 2009 20:07 |
|
Okey Dokey - no PMs, no trees!!!!!
And thanks for the tips. I think I already have a connection to Oz land - courtesy of an Assize Court....... ahem.
Cheers Evie!!
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
15 Apr 2009 00:44 |
|
For EvieBeavie and Denise...
Thanks to your sleuthing back end of March, I can now tell you that I have found John Hector on the 1861, 71 and 81 censuses!! I have also found his marriage.
John ECTOR (yes, spelt that way) married Mary Coppoth in Manchester Dec 1844. They then seem to have shuttled back and forth between Manchester and Staffordshire - 2 children born alternately in each place.
Mary died in 1876 in Wolstanton, Staffs.
John was a widower in 1881, living with his daughter Pheobe (I'm assuming Phoebe) who by then had married an Arthur TWEETS - well that 's what it looks like on the census.
I've found John under Ector, Hector and Hoctor, but regrettably as he was born in Dublin, that's probably as far back as I can go with him. However - it does give me Mary Coppoth to have a go at!!
Thanks for all the encouragement and help ladies - I couldn't have done it without you!
Lynne
|
|
Merlynne
|
Report
|
15 Apr 2009 00:46 |
|
Dee, I started a new thread to say thank you, but EvieBevie suggested I put it on here so you'd probably pick it up as well.
And following that, for info, Ann of GreenGables found his for me:
ARTHUR TWEATS Pedigree Male Family
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Event(s): Birth: Christening: Death: Burial:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marriages: Spouse: PHOEBE ACTON Family Marriage: 04 SEP 1877 Goldenhill, Stafford, England
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
so I can add Acton to the list of mistranscriptions now.....
Lynne
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
15 Apr 2009 00:50 |
|
Hi Lynne,
Spotted your other post.... should really be in bed...... I'll give it another 5 minutes though!!!
Acton now........... your list will be endless!!! LOL!!
Thanks again Lynne for the update, it's good to know that we helped you sort it out.
Dee xx
|