General Chat

it was cos the great Lancashire family had move dto Chesire..... John Cunliffe abt 1837 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Head Stayley Cheshire Jane Cunliffe abt 1838 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Wife Stayley Cheshire George H Cunliffe abt 1868 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Son Stayley Cheshire Harriet A Cunliffe abt 1870 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Daughter Stayley Cheshire Mary J Cunliffe abt 1866 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Daughter Stayley Cheshire Sarah A Cunliffe abt 1859 Rawtenstall, Lancashire, England Daughter Stayley Cheshire

spill the beans :-)

I too thought it very strange she was wondering how that 3 year old died but did not bother to get the death cert I would have. I also thought maybe the chidlren were hers and not her parents. Definitely a cover up .I am up for paying for 1 cert who wants to get the others , Has anybody written down the details of the childrens names dates of birth etc or will it be on the site ??? By the way I loved her Father what a lovely Man crying and getting all emotional , I had a horrible Father felt quite jealous of her.

Go on tell us, Rosalyn

I've found teh secret of the 1871..... want me to tell??

I found this weeks abit disappointing. I also thought it was strange about missing the 1871 census and not getting Thomas's death certificate, usually they get everyones certificates and have the tearful reveal at the register office. I think the 1912 census comment was about Ernest who was in Oz at the time, so maybe the dont have the silly 100 yr rule over there, but the woman who found Ernest and found out his occupation said that she had found him in the trade directory, there was no mention of him being found on a census. Karen

I was screaming at the telly that they were sons too and notice although they didn't show her getting any certificates she had one tucked in her book at the end

lol I think it is possible they were her sons aswell! Julia

I would have delved into the missing siblings some more to find what happened to them. Who they married and so on. GLoria

I too agree that they were hiding skeletons!! As for it looking easy...... they were handed stuff on a plate that had taken 20 years to collate.... not as much fun as searching it out yourself!! xx

they never got the boys birth certs either, very strange, more questions about what was missed out than what was mentioned !!! Im almost tempted to do it myself!!

I was waiting for them to find that the 2 boys Sarah looked after were her sons and not her brothers. The age gap meant that was possible. And that could have explained why she never mentioned any other siblings. Gloria

I would love someone to help me like that....they made it look so easy. Julia

WDYTA I was cross with how easy it seemed - that info she got about Ernest going to Aussie. If only it was as easy as that to find which ship peeps sailed on and even to show a picture of it and a passenger list!!

I wondered that - odd! we moan about hot having all of the 1841 available and she didn't bother with the 1871 - silly girl

I kept saying the same things lol Seems odd that they missed out the 1871 when it could have shown something else. I can understand not getting the cert, but I would have thought given he died so young, that she would have wanted to know why he died, not just a 'maybe'.

I was screaming at the TV she missed the 1971 Census and also she did not get Thomas death cert. Why? xxhugxx