Find Ancestors

Thanx to everyone for all your help it's made all the difference
cheers Chris

Chris,

You might want to contact Fulham register Office. Could be the birth never made it to the GRO.

Rose

When you order the certificate, where you put the normal details of the person you are ordering etc, you have addtional boxes to put in the fathers, mothers names etc. Just complete the box picking the fathers details I would suggest and then click on reference check on the bottom of the screen and the details should be checked (or possibly you don't have to click on that box, can't remember without seeing the screen infront of me). That is if you order it online. If you are calling them, just ask for a reference check.

Hope that helps. Gary

Hi Gary
That sounds like a good idea,how do i get a reference check?
Regards Chris

I've changed my mind about the birth for Charles Robert P. There are two Charles Tanners born in Hammersmith on the 1901 census and only 2 Charles Tanner births on FreeBMD.

Rose

Chris

I think the one Rose has found you is the right one. You could always order that cert and ask for reference checking with say the fathers name. That way it would only be £3 if it's the wrong one. I have been looking for a cousin of mine and have bought five wrong certs so far, so now going to ask for reference checking, so won't cost me as much.

Gary

Chris

Before 1875 Fulham came under Kensington

Julie

oopsy didn't read all of the thread lol

thanx Gary
that makes sense,it's typical that i can find the other siblings but not the one I am looking for robert Tanner c1892 fulham
Thanx Chris

Possible birth for Ellen registered in Jun 1890 in Fulham

Tanner Elizabeth Ellen Fulham 1a 223

Agree with Rose that Charles Robert is you most likely one, no others fit.

Gary

Births Mar 1895

Tanner Frank Fulham 1a 340
Tanner Herbert Fulham 1a 340

This could be possibly where Rose has come to the conclusion that Frank & Bert are twins, they are both on same page in same quarter, to confuse the matters there is also a Herbert Tanner born in 1899 in Fulham. Possibly they were twins and Herbert died and they had another boy called Herbert in 1899 registered in Fulham.

Gary

hi Rose
i have a copy of 1891 census where Ellen is 4 wks,but I'm a bit confused about your'e theory about Frank& Bertie being twin i think someone originally put Berties age as being the same as Franks them changed it to the right age of 2 is it possible for you to let me see the copy you have seen for the family in 1891
Thanx Chris

The ages are off a bit for the siblings in 1901. Frank and Bertie(Herbert) are actually twins and Ellen is listed as 4 weeks in 1891. I don't see her birth either.

Rose

The family is in Fulham district in 1891 and 1901.

There's this one:

Births Jun 1892
Tanner Charles Robert P Fulham 1a 188

Rose

Hi Rose
Names are
Robert William Tanner Jul qtr 1892
District Camberwell(1837-1919) County London Surrey V 1d P 954

William Tanner Jan qtr 1892 District Wandsworth County Greater London Surrey V 1d P 739

The one I am looking for is Robert (second name maybe William not sure tho) Tanner
b1892 Fulham parents Frederick&Eliza Tanner.have found him on censuses but can find no birth record
Thanx Chris

Can you give us the name?

Rose

Hi
Thanx everyone the year of birth is 1892

thanx

OK, it looks like there would have been a usable bridge for most of the period since 1837 - tolls abolished in mid-19th century:

"MORE BRIDGES AT LAST ... 1729 - 1900
In 1729, London's second Thames bridge opened to traffic
— a wooden bridge that crossed from Putney to Fulham. It is the predecessor of the Putney Bridge we have today.
And so the long period of river-crossing dominance by Old London Bridge came to an end. The growth and prosperity of the city and key support from the political sphere helped this come about.
Old Putney Bridge was followed by bridges at Westminster (1750), Blackfriars (1769) and Battersea (1772). As can be seen from the list at left, the turn of the century brought an acceleration in bridge building, starting with London's first cast iron bridge Old Vauxhall Bridge (1816).
Many of the bridges were privately funded and the charging of tolls was used to pay back investors. With the coming of the railways, the bridge-building trend continued and the arrival of increasing numbers of passengers put pressure on the non-tolled bridges they headed for. In the middle of the 19th century, the charging of tolls was abolished. "

Taken from:

http://www.engineering-timelines.com/why/
bridgesOfLondon/bridgesLondon_08.asp

Fulham was previously in the Kensington district

If they were born in Fulham then Camberwell and Wandsworth don't fit.

Fulham had it's own district after 1875.

When was this? Can you give details?

Rose

Hi Chris,

Camberwell is due south of the old London Bridge. Wandsworth is also south of the river, further west. Fulham is due north of Wandsworth, on the north isde of the river. There are a couple of bridges linking Fulham and Wandsworth now, but I'm not sure about the history of bridges over the Thames.