Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Look ups offered for a couple of hours - NOW CLOSE
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Andrea B | Report | 9 Jun 2005 15:00 |
|
Jenny In 1871 these are the only Ann/ie Richardson's born in Surrey: Ann Richardson abt 1861 Newington, Surrey, England Daughter Camberwell St Giles London Ann E Richardson abt 1859 Merton, Surrey, England Daughter Wimbledon Surrey Anne Richardson abt 1862 Croydon, Surrey, England Daughter Croydon Surrey Annie Richardson abt 1863 Bermondsey, Surrey, England Daughter Camberwell London Unfortunately none of them have a father named James. Have you also got the on 1881 and 1891? Best Wishes Andrea |
|||
|
Gigi | Report | 9 Jun 2005 15:33 |
|
Hi Andrea, Thanks for looking. Their marriage is becoming a real mystery!! Gillian |
|||
|
Jenny | Report | 9 Jun 2005 15:53 |
|
Hello Andrea, I don't yet have her on 1881 as was hoping to narrow down there were a few Annie Richardson's ,was hoping to confirm place of birth from 1871 to select from 1881. Found a definate on 1901 Annie Friun (found marriage 1895 to David Fruin)says birth place was Richmond surrey,but on same census daughter Mildred Florence born Richmond surrey and I have Mildred's birth cert and its Brentford not Richmond so Annie's might not be right on 1901. Had a possible for 1891 but shows her as 18 born about 1873 Twickenham this does not now tie up with info from her marriage cert and 1901 census age 39 so born about 1861-2. So would be 29 not 18 in 1891. This is one confussing ancestor! Thanks for the lookup & your time much appreciated. Jenny |
|||