Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1871 census lookup please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Darksecretz | Report | 3 Jul 2006 12:51 |
|
hiya again, hmmmnn, makes you wonder how much research this 3rd party has done, i mean I could be wrong, he could have all info from certs, we'll know that the census isnt exactly right all of the time. I would be very cautious with this info, If it were me, i'd check and recheck, or ask him if he's SURE his info is correct, otherwise you could be going in wrong diection altogether, maybe, worth getting a cert or two, if its really a connection to you???? Julie |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 3 Jul 2006 12:51 |
|
Just wondering if two Alfred Sharman Found this on 1881 - living with Ives family Alfred Sharman abt 1866 Warwickshire, England Step Son Kirkby in Ashfield 1881 presume you have this already Name: Barnes Sharman Age: 19 Estimated birth year: abt 1862 Relation: Servant Gender: Male Where Born: Shotwell, Warwickshire, England Civil parish: Lichfield St Michael County/Island: Staffordshire Country: England Street address: St John St Occupation: Ostler (Inn) Source information: RG11/2773 Registration district: Lichfield Sub registration district: Lichfield ED, institution, or vessel: 10 Folio: 51 Page: 10 GSU Number: 1341664 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Deb - The Leg Bones Connected To The.. | Report | 3 Jul 2006 13:13 |
|
Um, have emailed the person with the other tree. Hes connected via the Alfred so he could be looking at the wrong tree altogether if theres two about. Im connected via the Edward Coggins though, so the Edith is definatly a connection to me because i already had her. It would just be interesting to know if she did have these few extra children prior to marriage that i didnt have before. Dont you just hate it when you really want to find one census result and its the only one you cant find. LOL These things were sent to try us, as they say. x Thanks Deb |
|||