Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

alfred john bailey

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Julie

Julie Report 4 May 2007 16:53

Dolly Is this your Alfreds birth Births Mar 1859 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BAILEY Alfred Maidstone 2a 475 BAILEY Alfred Westbury 5a 143 BAILEY Alfred Forehoe 4b 187 BAILEY Alfred Brentford 3a 60 BAILEY Alfred Melksham 5a 120 BAILEY Alfred Ernest Ipswich 4a *3* >>>>>BAILEY Alfred John Wandsworth 1d 432 BAILEY Alfred Thomas Mile End 1c *5

Julie

Julie Report 4 May 2007 16:58

This could be the him on the 1861 Alfred J Bailey Age: 2 Estimated birth year: abt 1859 Relation: Son Father's name: James Mother's name: Athaliah Gender: Male Where born: Battersea, Surrey, England Civil parish: Battersea Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary County/Island: Surrey Country: England Street address: Occupation: Condition as to marriage: View image Registration district: Wandsworth Sub-registration district: Battersea ED, institution, or vessel: 16 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 1 Household Members: Name Age Alfred J Bailey 2 Athaliah Bailey 36 James Bailey 34 James H Bailey 9 Margaret Bailey 18 Eliza P Walker 18

Dorothy

Dorothy Report 4 May 2007 18:10

Hi Julie sorry for delay in answering had to go out. Yes i think it may be as i have found birth 1859 so that does fit . i had no idea that he was so much older than my aunt from a very grateful Dolly