Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Kay
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 13:12 |
|
Great, she is going to be very happy with all this information!! |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 12:39 |
|
Sure is Mel! With Mary and her Mum and Gran. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 12:30 |
|
Have noticed on 1841 Census there is a Tamar Kaye, 1836 5 yrs, Ashton & Oldham, Cheshire, could this be her? |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 12:16 |
|
Great find GillianMac, thanks |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 12:06 |
|
Well done GillianMac! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 12:00 |
|
Thanks again. Sorry GillianMac misread 1861 as 1841, bit late in the day for me!! |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 10 May 2011 12:00 |
|
Sorry I should have said 1861 census -now amended |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:56 |
|
I just can't see any of them in 1841 or 1851! I have tried searching for Tamar born 1837 without entering a surname - just in case Martha was living with Tamar's father and using his surname but no luck I 'm afraid. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 11:42 |
|
Thanks for your help Rootgatherer, now to try to find Mary, Tamer and Martha on the 1841 & 1851 Census |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:34 |
|
1881 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:33 |
|
Deaths Sep 1915 Dale Tamar 78 Oldham 8d 591 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:31 |
|
Looks like it was Thomas Dale that she married. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:28 |
|
This would be the correct district for a marriage for Tamar. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:21 |
|
Can't pick out the correct Martha in 1841 yet. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 11:19 |
|
GillianMac, can you give me the details of the 1841 Census, I assume Mary is not with them |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 11:17 |
|
Thanks, was typing when you sent 1861 Census |
|||
|
GillianMac | Report | 10 May 2011 11:15 |
|
I also found the 1861 above with Martha and Tamer together -and Martha is unmarried |
|||
|
MeJoy75 | Report | 10 May 2011 11:15 |
|
Me either, I'm in Australia. |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:13 |
|
Sorry the above census is the wrong one. The Tamar you're looking for is this one I think. Still single in 1861. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
rootgatherer | Report | 10 May 2011 11:08 |
|
Sorry, I am not too hot on English geography. |
|||
Researching: |
|||