Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Great grandmother and children.
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:37 |
|
What relation is John William Emmett, in 1901? |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:32 |
|
I think her Grandmother was Sibley too. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:31 |
|
The Thomas Grayson she is living next door to in 1881 had a son William born 1854. Was he younger than Martha when they married. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:30 |
|
Yes! in 1861: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:24 |
|
pm from Anne: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:21 |
|
This won't tell you where she's buried: |
|||
|
enna | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:20 |
|
Yes, Elizabeth nee Barlow. That could be the answer. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:16 |
|
Martha's mother Elizabeth was born about 1825, so this could well be her death: |
|||
|
enna | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:13 |
|
Yes, I always thought it was Emmett. (We must have croissed paths on that one!) Sorry. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:12 |
|
Choice of births: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:08 |
|
With her widowed father in 1871, who is a Post Office letter carrier: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:07 |
|
This could be her birth: |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:06 |
|
No the powell is a mistranscription which is why it has been amended at the top of the image. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:06 |
|
Anne - the 1881 is just a mistranscription of very bad writing on the original form. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:05 |
|
No, she is Emmett on the image, it has been mis-transcribed as Powell, which is why the correct name has been suggested in brackets. |
|||
|
enna | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:03 |
|
Dear all, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 21:00 |
|
It is Emmett NOT Powell on the image. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 20:52 |
|
So was she born as Powell? |
|||
|
Astra | Report | 30 Mar 2011 20:50 |
|
Powell |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 30 Mar 2011 20:47 |
|
Marriages Sep 1882 |
|||