Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1841 census for Carlisle please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 11 Mar 2011 00:15 |
|
lol!!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MargaretM | Report | 10 Mar 2011 21:29 |
|
Gotta contradict you now, Sylvia. Ages 25-29 were shown as 25. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 10 Mar 2011 21:18 |
|
Maureen |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Maureen | Report | 10 Mar 2011 21:11 |
|
I noticed the comment that ages change on the census. In 1841 the age was not always exact, the recorder was only required to record the age up to 15 years and then round it up to the nearest '5'. So if you were 21,22,23,24 or 25 - you would be listed as 25, then from 26-30, you would be 30 etc. Some recorders wrote the exact age, others just rounded it up. |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 23 Jan 2011 11:16 |
|
Births Jun 1851 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 23 Jan 2011 11:10 |
|
This looks like his death though, but the original states Graham Stow (no mention of , S) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 23 Jan 2011 10:35 |
|
Hi Flip, you have been busy! Thanks for all your searching, Whatever Stow/Stower is called he does not get registered as such. Because the ages/dates of birth for all the children change so much in the census it is difficult to determine if it is possibly a nickname for Oliver 1849 or some other before William 1855? |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 17:10 |
|
He was still on 1901 census, living with sister Annie Elizabeth Johnston at same address - she was now the innkeeper and head of household. No sign of Annie's husband though. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 17:02 |
|
Actually take that back. He is on the 1891 census with mother (a widow): |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 16:45 |
|
Not convinced the name is what is on the original - but it is so difficult to read. Do you have access to original records so you can look for yoursels? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 22 Jan 2011 16:28 |
|
Thanks Flip, the son now has a name! Isaac should be about 70/71 |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:49 |
|
Sorry, this bit didn't post: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:48 |
|
This looks like them, but the ages are way out on 1881 census! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:37 |
|
Thank you for what you have found Flip. |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 10:32 |
|
Strange, they don't appear to be together on 1881 census but there is another Graham family at the same address - coincidence? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 10:15 |
|
Looks like they had more children according to 1861 census: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Jan 2011 21:27 |
|
Frances |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:45 |
|
From the single line G.R. census it appears that Isaac and Mary were still in Carlisle in 1861 |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:40 |
|
Thanks for that Mel. The census suggests that although John and Mary were christened on the same day they were not twins. I have looked for a marriage of Isaac and Mary in Scotland but not found one. I am guessing she was possibly |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:32 |
|
All children of Issac and Mary on IGI. |
|||