Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
1841 census for Carlisle please
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:07 |
|
I have found the Graham family in IGI consisting of father Isaac and mother Mary. |
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:11 |
|
|
|||
|
Choccy | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:12 |
|
|
|||
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:20 |
|
Thank you for those Choccy, the 1851 definitely matches the family I am expecting but some of the children have disappeared from 1841. Need to check for deaths but, of course, they are old enough to have left home. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:32 |
|
All children of Issac and Mary on IGI. |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:40 |
|
Thanks for that Mel. The census suggests that although John and Mary were christened on the same day they were not twins. I have looked for a marriage of Isaac and Mary in Scotland but not found one. I am guessing she was possibly |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 21 Jan 2011 18:45 |
|
From the single line G.R. census it appears that Isaac and Mary were still in Carlisle in 1861 |
|||
|
SylviaInCanada | Report | 21 Jan 2011 21:27 |
|
Frances |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 10:15 |
|
Looks like they had more children according to 1861 census: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 10:32 |
|
Strange, they don't appear to be together on 1881 census but there is another Graham family at the same address - coincidence? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:37 |
|
Thank you for what you have found Flip. |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:48 |
|
This looks like them, but the ages are way out on 1881 census! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 12:49 |
|
Sorry, this bit didn't post: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 22 Jan 2011 16:28 |
|
Thanks Flip, the son now has a name! Isaac should be about 70/71 |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 16:45 |
|
Not convinced the name is what is on the original - but it is so difficult to read. Do you have access to original records so you can look for yoursels? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 17:02 |
|
Actually take that back. He is on the 1891 census with mother (a widow): |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 22 Jan 2011 17:10 |
|
He was still on 1901 census, living with sister Annie Elizabeth Johnston at same address - she was now the innkeeper and head of household. No sign of Annie's husband though. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Frances | Report | 23 Jan 2011 10:35 |
|
Hi Flip, you have been busy! Thanks for all your searching, Whatever Stow/Stower is called he does not get registered as such. Because the ages/dates of birth for all the children change so much in the census it is difficult to determine if it is possibly a nickname for Oliver 1849 or some other before William 1855? |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 23 Jan 2011 11:10 |
|
This looks like his death though, but the original states Graham Stow (no mention of , S) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flip | Report | 23 Jan 2011 11:16 |
|
Births Jun 1851 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||