Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Death of George Fox
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Madmeg | Report | 21 Apr 2010 22:25 |
|
Brenda, there is nothing wrong with George's age being of 30 on the 1841 census. Ages were rounded down to the nearest 5 years, so he could have been anything from 30 to nearly 35 (as was Jane). |
|||
|
BRC | Report | 21 Apr 2010 20:43 |
|
Thanks Ginny, I have looked at Christine's tree, it is not the right year for his death although everyone seems to have that year. There are only 2 deaths reg. 1849 Bristol and having bought both certs. have confirmed this. Regards Brenda |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BRC | Report | 21 Apr 2010 20:34 |
|
Madmeg, thanks they are the right family as I have all that info, but not the FreeBMD record for |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BRC | Report | 21 Apr 2010 20:28 |
|
Hi Michael |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
BRC | Report | 21 Apr 2010 20:19 |
|
Hi Patricia, yes 1841C residing Fishponds Bristol. Jane 30yrs, George 30yrs obviously wrong age, Labourer, John Son 13yrs, Emma 8yrs, Maria 6yrs, Sarah 3yrs. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 21 Apr 2010 17:47 |
|
This is not helping Brenda, but, in explanation, I had found a Jane that looked right in later censuses, but as I found her married in 1851 I had discounted her. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 21 Apr 2010 10:31 |
|
Michael, I think Brenda seems well aware of the need to do her own research, which is why she isn't relying on other trees which have him dying in 1849 (and it seems has spent money in disproving that) - and so has come on here for some assistance. |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 20 Apr 2010 21:47 |
|
And, had you (helpers) not thought that the census info may not be 'correct' |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 20 Apr 2010 20:47 |
|
That's why it's always wise to do, or check the research yourself. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 Apr 2010 20:42 |
|
I had discounted those census entries that you (helpers) had found precisely because Jane is not a widow in 1851. Do all those people claiming he died in 1849 not actually read the censuses, or - I cannot think of an or. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:49 |
|
This one looks a possible. |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:46 |
|
Hmm.. |
|||
|
Gee | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:43 |
|
Brenda |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:37 |
|
1841 England Census |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:35 |
|
I think this is them: |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:31 |
|
1861 England Census |
|||
|
Madmeg | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:28 |
|
Or this one: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:27 |
|
George Fox Pedigree |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 Apr 2010 18:16 |
|
Have you got the census entries for 1841 and 1851 (for his widow and children), please? |
|||
|
BRC | Report | 20 Apr 2010 17:45 |
|
Thanks Liz, no but I am hoping someone else has some info, other than what myself and other people that I know, who have a connection with the Fox family already have, as everyone who has contacted me directly have the 1849 date and this obviously is wrong. Brenda |
|||
Researching: |
|||