Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Rosa Stone

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

EvieBeavie

EvieBeavie Report 21 Nov 2008 21:35

The Thomas in 1851 does look like born Ratley, Leicestershire, on the image.

The Thomas in 1861 is Astley, Warwickshire.

Astley is near Bedworth, so that makes more sense.

It would be odd for Mary to have married two Thomases both so much younger than herself!

Someone could have misread Astley/Ratley way back at the time.

Helen

Helen Report 21 Nov 2008 21:42

I thought that aswell, must be the same man, there must have been some reason for the name change, that i think will remain a mystery i think.

Thankyou for your help Evie

EvieBeavie

EvieBeavie Report 21 Nov 2008 22:13

I might get hold of the certificate of the marriage to Mary and see what it says for father's name, if I were you, and then see whether he can be found in 1841, or a birth in the IGI.

... Duh, you said you were doing that.

Two name changes in my family turned out to be because of spots of bother -- one with the military and one with creditors. Neither seems likely in your case. Yours did shift, from 1851 in Warwickshire to 1861 in Staffordshire. One does wonder!

Helen

Helen Report 21 Nov 2008 23:02

Creditors a possible....lol