Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
john hughes
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jarvis | Report | 13 Nov 2008 20:05 |
|
hi team , what can i say ,there are no words to describe how i feel about all your work done tonight , give your selfs a pay rise, cheers brian, |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:43 |
|
I think that's probably it, Brian. That is definitely them in 1841, would it not be? |
|||
|
Jarvis | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:28 |
|
hi team, since sending the last message you have added a lot more , i just cant keep up with the info, pleased to see it , keep it coming, brian |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:28 |
|
You didn't say whether you have their marriage. Here is the other alternative in the IGI: |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:27 |
|
Er ... Jarvis. |
|||
|
Jarvis | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:24 |
|
hi team, thank you, the one with george hughes and harriet is correct, her name was also hughes, the pair i was interested in was john hughes and ann, i just wondered if they were on the 1841 census, you have given me a lot of names to ponder on, thank you very much, brian, |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:22 |
|
I do hope Jarvis takes a look back in here! |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:20 |
|
This is the immediately preceding household, and my opinion would be that the surname is Hughes, in case this is of interest: |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:15 |
|
The 1841 image for Hughes is terrible and the occupations are so faint I cannot tell what John's was. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:13 |
|
And here they are in 1841. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:10 |
|
Perhaps Jarvis also has daughter Eliza in 1841: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:06 |
|
51 England Census |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:05 |
|
What Jarvis didn't mention is that they are in the 1851 census, i.e. not deceased in 1841, so they must be there somewhere. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:05 |
|
You have saved this record to My Ancestry (Shoebox). |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:04 |
|
FreeBMD shows no John Hughes or Ann Hughes deaths in Droitwich district 1837-1841. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:03 |
|
I assumed that Jarvis knew what he needed about George -- but just in case, the two households in 1841 are |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:02 |
|
1871 England Census |
|||
|
PollyPoppet | Report | 13 Nov 2008 19:00 |
|
Search Records - 1841 Census (England and Wales) |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 13 Nov 2008 18:59 |
|
Or This |
|||
|
PollyPoppet | Report | 13 Nov 2008 18:57 |
|
1841 Census record for George Hughes «Back to results |
|||