Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
I'm confused
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hannah | Report | 12 May 2008 20:20 |
|
Thanks for bringing this to my attention christine. Great info. |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 12 May 2008 20:18 |
|
n |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 11 May 2008 14:19 |
|
Regarding the marriage of William Dainty in 1844 there was Ann Jackson on the same page, details on other thread, also her death and his remarriage. |
|||
|
ChristineinPortugal | Report | 11 May 2008 13:47 |
|
Hannah, |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:53 |
|
Ah right, i see now |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:36 |
|
I wonder why he isnt there. Maybe i need to send off for the birth certificate that i think might be jane and that might make things clearer. Thanks everyone for your help! |
|||
|
Jill | Report | 11 May 2008 10:29 |
|
Hannah i would go back and check your other threads on jane you may have missed some of the information found for you yesterday. |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:23 |
|
Thanks Siobhan.So thats 8 years after Jane was born. I wish there was a census for every year! |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:20 |
|
Thats true Elouise...i didnt think of that! |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:18 |
|
It says jane's father was a labourer. Thomas and jane have signed the certificate and then two other signatures, one is joseph and the other is jane. I cant make out the surnames at all. Jane's looks like yewman? |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:17 |
|
Yes those years seem right, going with the 1871 census |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:16 |
|
Ah so they married after Jane was born. Maybe jane did have a different mother and she died. Maybe thats where Anne comes in |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:02 |
|
What year is that marriage for? |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 10:01 |
|
Great thanks elouise |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 09:58 |
|
Can anyone see a marriage for william? maybe if he was married in warrington that might explain why jane was born there. |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 09:56 |
|
On the census, if it says she was born in middlewich, could she still have been in warrington do you think? |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 09:55 |
|
Could be Elouise, thanks, is that for 1860? |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 09:55 |
|
Thanks Christina, that could be her, i've never seen her as emily anywhere else but i suppose she could use her middle name |
|||
|
Hannah | Report | 11 May 2008 09:53 |
|
Thanks Ron. I just wondered if the surname had been spelt wrong/different. I suppose if they were born in warrington they could have ended up in sandbach/middlewich couldnt they? |
|||
|
Christina(Lancashire) | Report | 11 May 2008 09:52 |
|
Could be? On the image it reads Emily Jane Dainteth. |
|||